Park City is featured in the DepreciMax 2026 STR Bonus Depreciation Study — one of 197 US short-term rental markets analyzed. Park City carries the highest median STR prices in this batch (~$1.18M).
Utah conforms to federal bonus depreciation. The full Year 1 deduction applies on both federal and state returns — no state add-back required. This is the most favorable state tax posture for STR investors.
Park City's score reflects three compounding factors driving its bonus depreciation outcome:
Park City carries the highest median STR prices in this batch (~$1.18M). Even with ski-resort land ratios in the 30–40% range, the absolute depreciable basis is large: roughly $764k on a $1.175M purchase. That translates to a $312k median Year 1 deduction — and $115k+ in federal tax savings at 37%.
Park City STRs at the median price point carry high-end finishes throughout — custom millwork, stone countertops, Wolf/Sub-Zero appliances, smart-home systems, heated floors, and high-end window treatments. These all classify as 5-year personal property when added post-construction, pushing the bonus-eligible share to 23–30% of purchase price.
Utah is one of the most STR-investor-friendly states for bonus depreciation. The full federal Year 1 deduction flows through Utah state returns — no addback, no add-on. For high-bracket STR investors operating in Utah, this is the most favorable state tax posture.
Prevalence of 15-year land improvements we typically see across Park City short-term rentals — all 100% bonus-eligible in Year 1 under IRS §168(k):
Every active Park City short-term rental scored by Year 1 bonus depreciation potential — filtered by your price range and amenity preferences. Free market search shows every listing. Run a $99 detailed AI property report on any specific listing for line-item 5-year / 15-year / 39-year classification, closely calibrated to a formal cost seg study.
Park City's DepreciMax Score is the aggregate score across 100 active listings run through our proprietary algorithm. We use multiple inputs — including land values and AI photo recognition — calibrated over time against a completed cost segregation study on a benchmark short-term rental, with a target accuracy of closely calibrated on bonus-eligible % of purchase price.
More detail in the Top 50 Markets methodology section.
Run any active Park City listing through the DepreciMax property scorer. Free market search shows you every listing ranked by bonus depreciation potential. $99 per detailed AI report on a specific property — closely calibrated to a formal cost seg study.
Score Park City Properties →All 50 markets ranked by bonus depreciation score, with category filters and the full methodology.
View Full Report →Park City spans 3 primary zip codes with materially different land value ratios from FHFA assessor data. The calculator below has a zip dropdown — switch it to update the land ratio for your area. The bonus-eligible percentage (Park City's market-typical 27%) stays constant across zips because it reflects the property type, not the location. Utah conforms to federal §168(k) — full federal + state benefit.
See IRS Publication 946 for §168(k) rules. Use the interactive calculator below to model your specific deal.
Looking for a deeper read on your specific property, not just the market median? Run the $99 Park City property report — Claude Opus analyzes 7–9 listing photos against the IRS classification rules and returns a line-item §168(k) estimate closely calibrated to a formal $5K–$8K cost seg study.
See IRS Publication 946 for §168(k) rules. Run the interactive calculator to model your specific deal.
Head-to-head from the 2026 DepreciMax STR Bonus Depreciation Study — rank, price point.
| Market | Rank | Median Bonus % | Median Y1 Deduction | State Conformity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Park City | #78 | 21.2% | ~$493k on $2.3M STR | Full |
| Lake Cumberland | #1 | 27.1% | ~$89k on $330k STR | Full |
| Killington | #42 | 23.4% | ~$217k on $929k STR | Full |
Data source: 2026 DepreciMax STR Bonus Depreciation Study · snapshot 2026-07-18. See the Aspen vs Lake Cumberland writeup for the full head-to-head methodology.