Which of these two short-term rental markets is the better bonus depreciation play in 2026? Data from the DepreciMax STR Bonus Depreciation Study.
Joshua Tree wins on pure depreciation math — a lower land ratio (15% vs 28%) means more of every purchase dollar buys depreciable structure and finishes. Palm Springs works if you want the luxury market and higher nightly rates, but the tax math is meaningfully weaker.
| Metric | Joshua Tree, CA | Palm Springs, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Median bonus-eligible % (of purchase price) | 26%Better tax math | 23% |
| Median STR purchase price | $397K | $769K |
| Typical Year-1 write-off | ~$103K | ~$177K |
| Median land ratio | 15% | 28% |
| Diamond density (≥24% bonus-eligible listings) | 69% | 35% |
Investors optimizing for Year-1 write-off per dollar. Lower entry price ($397K median vs $769K), better bonus depreciation math, and 69% Diamond density.
Investors who want a luxury coastal-desert brand and higher weekly rents. Accept a weaker land ratio and Diamond density (35%) in exchange for market prestige.
Enter any address in either market — get a line-item bonus depreciation report in ~5 minutes.
Get a $99 property report →Data source: DepreciMax STR Bonus Depreciation Study — 2026