STR Market Comparison · 2026

Joshua Tree, CA vs Palm Springs, CA — short-term rental bonus depreciation head-to-head

Which of these two short-term rental markets is the better bonus depreciation play in 2026? Data from the DepreciMax STR Bonus Depreciation Study.

Verdict

Joshua Tree wins on depreciation math

Joshua Tree wins on pure depreciation math — a lower land ratio (15% vs 28%) means more of every purchase dollar buys depreciable structure and finishes. Palm Springs works if you want the luxury market and higher nightly rates, but the tax math is meaningfully weaker.

Joshua Tree vs Palm Springs — data head-to-head

Metric Joshua Tree, CA Palm Springs, CA
Median bonus-eligible % (of purchase price) 26%Better tax math 23%
Median STR purchase price $397K $769K
Typical Year-1 write-off ~$103K ~$177K
Median land ratio 15% 28%
Diamond density (≥24% bonus-eligible listings) 69% 35%
Joshua Tree, CA

When to choose Joshua Tree

Investors optimizing for Year-1 write-off per dollar. Lower entry price ($397K median vs $769K), better bonus depreciation math, and 69% Diamond density.

Palm Springs, CA

When to choose Palm Springs

Investors who want a luxury coastal-desert brand and higher weekly rents. Accept a weaker land ratio and Diamond density (35%) in exchange for market prestige.

Not sure which is right? Run the numbers on a specific property.

Enter any address in either market — get a line-item bonus depreciation report in ~5 minutes.

Get a $99 property report →

Data source: DepreciMax STR Bonus Depreciation Study — 2026